Abstract
After highlighting Aristotle’s rejection of Platonic participation in the world of Ideas and distinguishing between a logical and a metaphysical use of the notion of participation, this study focuses on Nicomachean Ethics A 13, which presents a different kind of participation different from those previously identified, characterized by an explicit and insistent use of the vocabulary of participation, with a precise and consistent meaning. It refers to a real participation, in which the appetitive powers of the soul partake in a perfection proper to rationality, by virtue of which they can be configured to a higher order, with greater autonomy than that of the body in relation to the soul, and in varying degrees.
| Translated title of the contribution | is tHere any kind of real participation in aristotle? double rationality in tHe soul’s potencies in nic. et. a 13 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 204-226 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Hypnos |
| Issue number | 53 |
| State | Published - 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'is tHere any kind of real participation in aristotle? double rationality in tHe soul’s potencies in nic. et. a 13'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver