Fallacy of the last bed dilemma

Luca Valera*, María A. Carrasco, Ricardo Castro

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the relevance of adequate decision making at both public health and healthcare levels. A bioethical response to the demand for medical care, supplies and access to critical care is needed. Ethically sound strategies are required for the allocation of increasingly scarce resources, such as rationing critical care beds. In this regard, it is worth mentioning the so-called 'last bed dilemma'. In this paper, we examine this dilemma, pointing out the main criteria used to solve it and argue that we cannot face these ethical issues as though they are only a dilemma. A more complex ethical view regarding the care of COVID-19 patients that is focused on proportional and ordinary treatments is required. Furthermore, discussions and forward planning are essential because deliberation becomes extremely complex during an emergency and the physicians' sense of responsibility may be increased if it is faced only as a moral dilemma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)915-921
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume48
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 31 May 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©

Keywords

  • allocation of health care resources
  • COVID-19
  • end of life care
  • moral and religious aspects
  • resource allocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fallacy of the last bed dilemma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this