El derecho de opción establecido en el artículo 36 bis de la Ley de Concesiones de Obra Pública. Comentario a la sentencia de la Corte Suprema, de 30 de noviembre de 2017, rol N° 35.751-2017

Translated title of the contribution: The Right of Option established in Article 36 bis of the Public Works Concessions Law. Commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court, dated November 30, 2017, Docket N° 35,751-2017
  • Su Xey Castro Herrera*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Article 36 bis of the Public Works Concessions Law grants the parties a right of choice to select which is the competent Court —the Court of Appeals of Santiago or the Arbitral Commission— to adjudicate any disputes or claims arising from the interpretation, application, or execution of the concession contract. Once the Arbitral Commission of the concession contract is established and the procedural rules are agreed upon, the parties designate the Arbitral Commission as the natural judge and withdraw the Court of Appeals of Santiago from its competence to adjudicate present or future claims.

Translated title of the contributionThe Right of Option established in Article 36 bis of the Public Works Concessions Law. Commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court, dated November 30, 2017, Docket N° 35,751-2017
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)130-138
Number of pages9
JournalRevista Juridica Digital Uandes
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, University of the Andes. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Right of Option established in Article 36 bis of the Public Works Concessions Law. Commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court, dated November 30, 2017, Docket N° 35,751-2017'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this