El caso del despido indirecto y la suspensión del plazo: ¿interpretación o creación judicial del derecho?

Luis A. Silva Irarrázaval

doi:10.4067/S0718-00122019000200433

El caso del despido indirecto y la suspensión del plazo: ¿interpretación o creación judicial del derecho?

Translated title of the contribution: Interpreting or creating the law? A critical approach to the judicial understanding of section 171 of the Labor Code: a critical approach to the judicial understanding of section 171 of the Labor Code

Luis A. Silva Irarrázaval

Facultad de Derecho

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze a Labor case law which consists in the extension of a rule of section 168 final paragraph of the Labor Code to a different hypothetical, that of section 171. It states that judicial enforcement of section 168’s rule to those situations covered by section 171 ensues not as the product of judicial interpretation but as an outcome of judicial activism. Under the claim that they are applying a central principle of Labor Law, judges alter legislator’s intent by attaching a different juridical value to factual premises underlying the legal text. By this fashion, judges become legislators themselves.

Translated title of the contribution	Interpreting or creating the law? A critical approach to the judicial understanding of section 171 of the Labor Code: a critical approach to the judicial understanding of section 171 of the Labor Code
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	433-458
Number of pages	26
Journal	Ius et Praxis
Volume	25
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122019000200433
State	Published - 12 Aug 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Universidad de Talca.

Keywords

LAW
Integration of the law
statutory interpretation
dismissal

Access to Document

10.4067/S0718-00122019000200433

http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-00122019000200433&lng=es&tlng=es

Cite this

@article{5a4b6efa78774cb4b317e6f5b2f9a286,

title = "El caso del despido indirecto y la suspensi{\'o}n del plazo: ¿interpretaci{\'o}n o creaci{\'o}n judicial del derecho?",

abstract = "Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze a Labor case law which consists in the extension of a rule of section 168 final paragraph of the Labor Code to a different hypothetical, that of section 171. It states that judicial enforcement of section 168{\textquoteright}s rule to those situations covered by section 171 ensues not as the product of judicial interpretation but as an outcome of judicial activism. Under the claim that they are applying a central principle of Labor Law, judges alter legislator{\textquoteright}s intent by attaching a different juridical value to factual premises underlying the legal text. By this fashion, judges become legislators themselves.",

keywords = "LAW, Integration of the law, statutory interpretation, dismissal, Integraci{\'o}n del derecho, interpretaci{\'o}n de la ley, despido laboral",

author = "{Silva Irarr{\'a}zaval}, {Luis A.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Universidad de Talca.",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

day = "12",

doi = "10.4067/S0718-00122019000200433",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "25",

pages = "433--458",

journal = "Ius et Praxis",

issn = "0717-2877",

publisher = "Universidad de Talca",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - El caso del despido indirecto y la suspensión del plazo

T2 - ¿interpretación o creación judicial del derecho?

AU - Silva Irarrázaval, Luis A.

PY - 2019/8/12

Y1 - 2019/8/12

N2 - Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze a Labor case law which consists in the extension of a rule of section 168 final paragraph of the Labor Code to a different hypothetical, that of section 171. It states that judicial enforcement of section 168’s rule to those situations covered by section 171 ensues not as the product of judicial interpretation but as an outcome of judicial activism. Under the claim that they are applying a central principle of Labor Law, judges alter legislator’s intent by attaching a different juridical value to factual premises underlying the legal text. By this fashion, judges become legislators themselves.

AB - Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze a Labor case law which consists in the extension of a rule of section 168 final paragraph of the Labor Code to a different hypothetical, that of section 171. It states that judicial enforcement of section 168’s rule to those situations covered by section 171 ensues not as the product of judicial interpretation but as an outcome of judicial activism. Under the claim that they are applying a central principle of Labor Law, judges alter legislator’s intent by attaching a different juridical value to factual premises underlying the legal text. By this fashion, judges become legislators themselves.

KW - LAW

KW - Integration of the law

KW - statutory interpretation

KW - dismissal

KW - Integración del derecho

KW - interpretación de la ley

KW - despido laboral

U2 - 10.4067/S0718-00122019000200433

DO - 10.4067/S0718-00122019000200433

M3 - Article

SN - 0717-2877

VL - 25

SP - 433

EP - 458

JO - Ius et Praxis

JF - Ius et Praxis

IS - 2

ER -

El caso del despido indirecto y la suspensión del plazo: ¿interpretación o creación judicial del derecho?

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this