El caso del centinela: Utilidad y mérito en la teoría de la justicia de Adam Smith

Translated title of the contribution: The Case of the Centinel: Utility and Merit in Adam Smith's Theory of Justice

María A. Carrasco, Gonzalo Andrés Vidueira Mociño

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Within the framework of moral sentimentalism, Adam Smith develops a conception of justice that combines the retributive justice of his predecessor, Joseph Butler, with the proto-utilitarian elements of his contemporary, David Hume. Smith blends these two traditions through a compound judgment in which he articulates the resentment caused by the harm done by an equal with the social utility of punishment. By identifying the various components that are coordinated in Smith’s judgment of justice (resentment, utility, spontaneous affective reaction, judgment of the impartial spectator), the richness and nuance of Smith’s moral psychology are verified. This allows us to explain, without contradiction, the case that simpler psychologies cannot justify: the centinel condemned for falling asleep on duty.

Translated title of the contributionThe Case of the Centinel: Utility and Merit in Adam Smith's Theory of Justice
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)389-399
Number of pages11
JournalLas Torres De Lucca
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Departamento de Filosofia y Sociedad, Complutense University of Madrid. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Case of the Centinel: Utility and Merit in Adam Smith's Theory of Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this