TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of low-level laser therapy as an auxiliary tool for management of acute side effects of head and neck radiotherapy
AU - González-Arriagada, Wilfredo Alejandro
AU - Ramos, Lara Maria Alencar
AU - Andrade, Marco Aurélio Carvalho
AU - Lopes, Marcio Ajudarte
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2018/2/17
Y1 - 2018/2/17
N2 - Introduction: Head and neck radiotherapy (HNRT) is associated with acute and chronic side effects, some of which result in great morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an oral care tool for the management of these effects. Materials and Methods: Clinical information was collected from 216 patients undergoing HNRT; these individuals were divided into a control group without laser therapy (n = 108) and a laser group (n = 108). The intervention of the laser group was performed in a different period to the control group and was applied three times weekly. All data were analyzed by a descriptive statistical analysis. Results: The presence and severity of mucositis were similar between the groups. However, the laser group showed a lower frequency of interruption of oncologic therapy related to mucositis (p = 0.030) and the need of nasogastric tube nutrition during the HNRT (p = 0.027). In addition, trismus was less intense in the laser group (p = 0.023). Conclusions: The introduction of laser therapy in the supportive care for patients undergoing HNRT showed benefits for the patient and the medical system, reducing morbidity and costs associated with side-effects.
AB - Introduction: Head and neck radiotherapy (HNRT) is associated with acute and chronic side effects, some of which result in great morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an oral care tool for the management of these effects. Materials and Methods: Clinical information was collected from 216 patients undergoing HNRT; these individuals were divided into a control group without laser therapy (n = 108) and a laser group (n = 108). The intervention of the laser group was performed in a different period to the control group and was applied three times weekly. All data were analyzed by a descriptive statistical analysis. Results: The presence and severity of mucositis were similar between the groups. However, the laser group showed a lower frequency of interruption of oncologic therapy related to mucositis (p = 0.030) and the need of nasogastric tube nutrition during the HNRT (p = 0.027). In addition, trismus was less intense in the laser group (p = 0.023). Conclusions: The introduction of laser therapy in the supportive care for patients undergoing HNRT showed benefits for the patient and the medical system, reducing morbidity and costs associated with side-effects.
KW - adverse effects
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - oral mucositis
KW - radiation
KW - xerostomia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036504416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14764172.2017.1376097
DO - 10.1080/14764172.2017.1376097
M3 - Article
C2 - 29020483
AN - SCOPUS:85036504416
SN - 1476-4172
VL - 20
SP - 117
EP - 122
JO - Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy
JF - Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy
IS - 2
ER -