TY - JOUR
T1 - Education and income
T2 - Which is more important for mental health?
AU - Araya, R.
AU - Lewis, G.
AU - Rojas, G.
AU - Fritsch, R.
PY - 2003/7/1
Y1 - 2003/7/1
N2 - Study objective: To assess which indicators of socioeconomic status are associated with an increased prevalence of common mental disorders. Design: Cross sectional household survey. Setting: Santiago, Chile. Participants: Random sample of adults aged 16-65 residing in private households. Main results: Less education (odds ratio 2.44, 95% confidence intervals 1.50 to 3.97), a recent income decrease (odds ratio 2.14, 1.70 to 2.70), and poor housing (odds ratio 1.53, 1.05 to 2.23), were the only socioeconomic status variables that remained significantly associated with an increased prevalence of common mental disorders after adjustments. The prevalence of common mental disorders was also higher among people with manual unskilled occupations, overcrowded housing, and lower per capita income but these associations disappeared after adjustment for other explanatory and confounding variables. Conclusions: There is a strong, inverse, and independent association between education and common mental disorders. However, income was not associated with the prevalence of common mental disorders, after adjusting for other socioeconomic variables. Similar results have been found in other Latin American studies but British studies tend to find the opposite, that income but not education is associated with common mental disorders. Understanding the impact of socioeconomic factors on mental health requires research in poor as well as rich countries.
AB - Study objective: To assess which indicators of socioeconomic status are associated with an increased prevalence of common mental disorders. Design: Cross sectional household survey. Setting: Santiago, Chile. Participants: Random sample of adults aged 16-65 residing in private households. Main results: Less education (odds ratio 2.44, 95% confidence intervals 1.50 to 3.97), a recent income decrease (odds ratio 2.14, 1.70 to 2.70), and poor housing (odds ratio 1.53, 1.05 to 2.23), were the only socioeconomic status variables that remained significantly associated with an increased prevalence of common mental disorders after adjustments. The prevalence of common mental disorders was also higher among people with manual unskilled occupations, overcrowded housing, and lower per capita income but these associations disappeared after adjustment for other explanatory and confounding variables. Conclusions: There is a strong, inverse, and independent association between education and common mental disorders. However, income was not associated with the prevalence of common mental disorders, after adjusting for other socioeconomic variables. Similar results have been found in other Latin American studies but British studies tend to find the opposite, that income but not education is associated with common mental disorders. Understanding the impact of socioeconomic factors on mental health requires research in poor as well as rich countries.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Chile
KW - Confidence Intervals
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Educational Status
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Income
KW - Male
KW - Mental Disorders
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Odds Ratio
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Socioeconomic Factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038818486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jech.57.7.501
DO - 10.1136/jech.57.7.501
M3 - Article
C2 - 12821693
AN - SCOPUS:0038818486
SN - 0143-005X
VL - 57
SP - 501
EP - 505
JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
IS - 7
ER -