¿DEBEN LAS DEMOCRACIAS LIBERALES ACEPTAR ARGUMENTOS RELIGIOSOS EN EL DEBATE PÚBLICO? Una reflexión a partir del pensamiento de Nicholas Wolterstorff y Joseph Ratzinger

Translated title of the contribution: Should liberal democracies accept religious arguments in public debate? A reflection on the thought of Nicholas Wolterstorff and Joseph Ratzinger

Teresa Cordero*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

One of the conflicts faced by liberal democracies has to do with the tendency to exclude religious arguments from public debate, because they are reasons that not all citizens are in a position to share. However, under this logic, some inconsistencies may arise that affect the very core of liberalism. Through the thought of two intellectual figures who –from the different perspectives of theology and philosophy of religion– have addressed these issues, Nicholas Wolterstorff and Joseph Ratzinger, we propose to reflect on the need for liberal democracy to include the religious dimension in the political discussion, if it wants to be faithful to its principles.

Translated title of the contributionShould liberal democracies accept religious arguments in public debate? A reflection on the thought of Nicholas Wolterstorff and Joseph Ratzinger
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)47-60
Number of pages14
JournalPrudentia Iuris
Volume2023
Issue number95
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should liberal democracies accept religious arguments in public debate? A reflection on the thought of Nicholas Wolterstorff and Joseph Ratzinger'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this