Consensus and the Intensity of Judicial Review in the European Court of Human Rights

Soledad Bertelsen

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_16

Consensus and the Intensity of Judicial Review in the European Court of Human Rights

Soledad Bertelsen^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

The use of consensus as a factor of the margin of appreciation has been highly criticized for clashing with fundamental ideas of human rights theory. In this article I am going to address the main criticisms consensus receives and suggest a different use of this factor by human rights courts.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Ius Gentium
Publisher	Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Pages	295-311
Number of pages	17
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_16
State	Published - 2017

Publication series

Name	Ius Gentium
Volume	61
ISSN (Electronic)	2214-9902

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.

Keywords

Consensus, margin of appreciation
European Court of Human Rights

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_16

Cite this

@inbook{e3dc04d7370a4b8e94af5b7247b7808c,

title = "Consensus and the Intensity of Judicial Review in the European Court of Human Rights",

abstract = "The use of consensus as a factor of the margin of appreciation has been highly criticized for clashing with fundamental ideas of human rights theory. In this article I am going to address the main criticisms consensus receives and suggest a different use of this factor by human rights courts.",

keywords = "Consensus, margin of appreciation, European Court of Human Rights",

author = "Soledad Bertelsen",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_16",

language = "English",

series = "Ius Gentium",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

pages = "295--311",

booktitle = "Ius Gentium",

address = "Germany",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Consensus and the Intensity of Judicial Review in the European Court of Human Rights

AU - Bertelsen, Soledad

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The use of consensus as a factor of the margin of appreciation has been highly criticized for clashing with fundamental ideas of human rights theory. In this article I am going to address the main criticisms consensus receives and suggest a different use of this factor by human rights courts.

AB - The use of consensus as a factor of the margin of appreciation has been highly criticized for clashing with fundamental ideas of human rights theory. In this article I am going to address the main criticisms consensus receives and suggest a different use of this factor by human rights courts.

KW - Consensus, margin of appreciation

KW - European Court of Human Rights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143548244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_16

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_16

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85143548244

T3 - Ius Gentium

SP - 295

EP - 311

BT - Ius Gentium

PB - Springer Science and Business Media B.V.

ER -

Consensus and the Intensity of Judicial Review in the European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

Publication series

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this