Comparison of different reference values of fetal blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery for predicting fetal anemia

J. L. Bartha*, S. Illanes, S. Abdel-Fattah, A. Hunter, M. Denbow, P. W. Soothill

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To compare different normal reference ranges of fetal blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery for predicting fetal anemia. Methods: Eight reference ranges of either middle cerebral artery peak or time-averaged mean velocities were compared using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve for 113 fetal blood samples from 60 women at risk of fetal red blood cell alloimmunization. Results: The areas under the ROC curves of the different ranges were not significantly different but there were marked differences in sensitivity (range, 7.14-91.78%) and specificity (range, 31.25-96.88%) with the currently used cut-offs. Except for Man's range, the best theoretical cut-offs, defined as those having the best sensitivity with the best specificity, differed from those in current use, especially when using time-averaged mean velocity. Conclusions: Any of the previously reported reference ranges perform well in the non-invasive prediction of fetal anemia. However, with the exception of Man's curve, the currently employed cut-offs for predicting fetal anemia should be changed, some of them markedly, in order to provide reliable support for clinical decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-340
Number of pages6
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alloimmunization
  • Fetal Doppler
  • Fetal anemia
  • Middle cerebral artery
  • Rhesus disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of different reference values of fetal blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery for predicting fetal anemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this