Comparison of the effectiveness of two strategies teaching methodology in the development of the reading comprehension in the first school year

Translated title of the contribution: Comparison of the effectiveness of two strategies teaching methodology in the development of the reading comprehension in the first school year

María Cecilia Hudson Pérez, Carla E. Förster Marín, Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona, María Francisca Valenzuela , Paula Riesco Valdés, Antonietta Ramaciotti Ferré

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents the results that were achieved by implementing an early literacy program using a balanced method (GE) and a traditional method (GT) to 194 first year students in five schools located in Santiago de Chile (Chile) that were characterized by a poor performance in the national standardized test called SIMCE. The objective was to compare the effect of those methods for early literacy and the possible differences related to gender. The results show that both groups obtained similar progresses at the end of the school year, although the children who learned by GE achieved better results in more complex reading comprehension abilities, particularly for what regards to the recognition of implicit information in simple texts. The GT group shows gender differences with better results for men.

Translated title of the contributionComparison of the effectiveness of two strategies teaching methodology in the development of the reading comprehension in the first school year
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-118
Number of pages19
JournalPerfiles Educativos
Volume35
Issue number140
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Balanced method
  • Early literacy
  • Reading acquisition
  • Reading comprehension
  • Skill based method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the effectiveness of two strategies teaching methodology in the development of the reading comprehension in the first school year'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this