Cirugía de revascularización miocárdica versus angioplastía en el tratamiento de la enfermedad coronaria de tres vasos y tronco de la coronaria izquierda

Olivares R. Gabriel; Nicolás Veas

doi:10.4067/S0034-98872021000801182

Cirugía de revascularización miocárdica versus angioplastía en el tratamiento de la enfermedad coronaria de tres vasos y tronco de la coronaria izquierda

Translated title of the contribution: Coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe three vessel disease

Olivares R. Gabriel^*
, Nicolás Veas

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the beneficial outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery and left main disease. An increased long-term survival after CABG is associated with a reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates. While PCI treats only flow-limiting lesions, CABG treats the whole coronary artery, preventing events in the future. Due to different clinical and anatomic factors affecting the outcomes, the heart team should formulate treatment assignment recommendations.

Translated title of the contribution	Coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe three vessel disease
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	1182-1188
Number of pages	7
Journal	Revista Medica de Chile
Volume	149
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872021000801182
State	Published - Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Sociedad Medica de Santiago. All rights reserved.

Access to Document

10.4067/S0034-98872021000801182

Cite this

@article{16c013f871b14b0e8c7d33a9ad2b1003,

title = "Cirug{\'i}a de revascularizaci{\'o}n mioc{\'a}rdica versus angioplast{\'i}a en el tratamiento de la enfermedad coronaria de tres vasos y tronco de la coronaria izquierda",

abstract = "Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the beneficial outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery and left main disease. An increased long-term survival after CABG is associated with a reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates. While PCI treats only flow-limiting lesions, CABG treats the whole coronary artery, preventing events in the future. Due to different clinical and anatomic factors affecting the outcomes, the heart team should formulate treatment assignment recommendations.",

keywords = "Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures, Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention",

author = "Gabriel, \{Olivares R.\} and Nicol{\'a}s Veas",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

doi = "10.4067/S0034-98872021000801182",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "149",

pages = "1182--1188",

journal = "Revista Medica de Chile",

issn = "0034-9887",

publisher = "Sociedad Medica de Santiago",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cirugía de revascularización miocárdica versus angioplastía en el tratamiento de la enfermedad coronaria de tres vasos y tronco de la coronaria izquierda

AU - Gabriel, Olivares R.

AU - Veas, Nicolás

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the beneficial outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery and left main disease. An increased long-term survival after CABG is associated with a reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates. While PCI treats only flow-limiting lesions, CABG treats the whole coronary artery, preventing events in the future. Due to different clinical and anatomic factors affecting the outcomes, the heart team should formulate treatment assignment recommendations.

AB - Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the beneficial outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery and left main disease. An increased long-term survival after CABG is associated with a reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates. While PCI treats only flow-limiting lesions, CABG treats the whole coronary artery, preventing events in the future. Due to different clinical and anatomic factors affecting the outcomes, the heart team should formulate treatment assignment recommendations.

KW - Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures

KW - Coronary Artery Disease

KW - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122737569

U2 - 10.4067/S0034-98872021000801182

DO - 10.4067/S0034-98872021000801182

M3 - Review article

C2 - 35319705

AN - SCOPUS:85122737569

SN - 0034-9887

VL - 149

SP - 1182

EP - 1188

JO - Revista Medica de Chile

JF - Revista Medica de Chile

IS - 8

ER -

Cirugía de revascularización miocárdica versus angioplastía en el tratamiento de la enfermedad coronaria de tres vasos y tronco de la coronaria izquierda

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this