Biomechanical comparison in a cadaveric flatfoot model between different calcaneal osteotomies with and without transfer from the peroneus brevis to the longus

Emilio Wagner*, Pablo Wagner, Sebastian Gericke, Oscar Torrealba, Felipe H. Palma, Rodrigo Guzman Venegas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Progressive collapsing flexible foot deformities are generally treated with joint-preserving techniques. Our objective was to evaluate biomechanically the effect of different calcaneal osteotomies with or without a peroneus brevis to longus transfer (PBtoPL) on a cadaveric flatfoot model. Methods: 15 cadaveric foot and ankle specimens were used in a mid-stance phase of gait model. Evans, medial displacement, Double, Z (step cut), and IZ (inverted Z) osteotomies were compared. A Vicon positioning system was used to measure angular changes. Results: Evans and Double osteotomies generated the highest adduction effect; Z and IZ osteotomies generated 50 % less. Evans, Double and IZ osteotomies created a significant supination effect. The PBtoPL transfer produced non-significant changes. Conclusions: Evans and Double osteotomies were the most potent calcaneal osteotomies. Evans, Double, and IZ osteotomies had a similar supination effect. Further studies are needed to explore the role of the PBtoPL tendon transfer in greater detail.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFoot and Ankle Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 European Foot and Ankle Society

Keywords

  • Adduction effect
  • Cadaveric flatfoot model
  • Calcaneal osteotomies
  • Peroneus brevis to longus transfer
  • Supination effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomechanical comparison in a cadaveric flatfoot model between different calcaneal osteotomies with and without transfer from the peroneus brevis to the longus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this