This work aims to justify that, although it is true that there are differences between Aristotelian and Schmittian philosophy, there is a point of connection between both in what refers to prudence. In particular, we intend to demonstrate that in Schmitt’s description of the role of the judge in Law and Judgment (1912) and On the three types of juristic thought (1934) ideas of the practical philosophy of the Stagirite are present.
|Translated title of the contribution||Embrace the exception. The prudence of the judge as a point of connection between Schmittian and Aristotelic ideas|
|Number of pages||15|
|State||Published - 1 May 2021|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2021 Universidad de Murcia Servicio de Publicaciones. All rights reserved.