TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of fused deposition modeling using biodegradable material
T2 - A comparative study with four resin-based additive manufacturing methods
AU - Gallardo, Yolanda Natali Raico
AU - Karayazgan, Banu
AU - Mukai, Eduardo
AU - Soto, Claudio Peña
AU - Sukotjo, Cortino
AU - Nima, Gabriel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) using a biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) material in comparison to four resin-based additive manufacturing methods. Methods: A virtual maxillary arch was designed using a design software (DentalCAD, Exocad GmbH) and printed 10 times per group. Five additive manufacturing methods were used including: FDM, stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), liquid crystal display (LCD), and PolyJet (PJ). Fifty printed casts were scanned using an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona), and STL files were compared to the original design using a metrology software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems). The 3D analysis was performed on the overall cast and in the anterior, right posterior and left posterior regions. Trueness was determined by calculating the mean root mean square (RMS) value, while precision was assessed using the standard deviation of the RMS values. Color maps were used for visual analysis. The accuracy data did not meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance; therefore, a generalized linear model (GLM) was applied as a robust parametric alternative, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05). Results: The PJ technology demonstrated the highest trueness among all groups (57.35 ± 17.73 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05). FDM and SLA showed comparable trueness. The lowest trueness was observed in the DLP (163.37 ± 56.06 µm) and LCD groups (151.27 ± 52.36 µm). In terms of precision, PJ demonstrated the highest values among all groups (54.92 ± 16.89 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05), followed by SLA and FDM groups, with no statistically significant difference between them. The lowest precision was observed in the DLP and LCD groups. Color displacement maps revealed larger deviations in the occlusal areas for DLP, SLA, and LCD groups, characterized by both expansion and shrinkage. FDM group showed a distinct pattern of shrinkage in the anterior zone and expansion in occlusal areas. Conclusion: FDM with biodegradable PLA demonstrated accuracy comparable to PJ and SLA, highlighting its potential as a sustainable alternative for dental cast fabrication. Clinical Significance: Incorporating biodegradable materials into 3D printing offers a valuable step toward more eco-friendly and cost-effective dental additive manufacturing solutions.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) using a biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) material in comparison to four resin-based additive manufacturing methods. Methods: A virtual maxillary arch was designed using a design software (DentalCAD, Exocad GmbH) and printed 10 times per group. Five additive manufacturing methods were used including: FDM, stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), liquid crystal display (LCD), and PolyJet (PJ). Fifty printed casts were scanned using an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona), and STL files were compared to the original design using a metrology software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems). The 3D analysis was performed on the overall cast and in the anterior, right posterior and left posterior regions. Trueness was determined by calculating the mean root mean square (RMS) value, while precision was assessed using the standard deviation of the RMS values. Color maps were used for visual analysis. The accuracy data did not meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance; therefore, a generalized linear model (GLM) was applied as a robust parametric alternative, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05). Results: The PJ technology demonstrated the highest trueness among all groups (57.35 ± 17.73 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05). FDM and SLA showed comparable trueness. The lowest trueness was observed in the DLP (163.37 ± 56.06 µm) and LCD groups (151.27 ± 52.36 µm). In terms of precision, PJ demonstrated the highest values among all groups (54.92 ± 16.89 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05), followed by SLA and FDM groups, with no statistically significant difference between them. The lowest precision was observed in the DLP and LCD groups. Color displacement maps revealed larger deviations in the occlusal areas for DLP, SLA, and LCD groups, characterized by both expansion and shrinkage. FDM group showed a distinct pattern of shrinkage in the anterior zone and expansion in occlusal areas. Conclusion: FDM with biodegradable PLA demonstrated accuracy comparable to PJ and SLA, highlighting its potential as a sustainable alternative for dental cast fabrication. Clinical Significance: Incorporating biodegradable materials into 3D printing offers a valuable step toward more eco-friendly and cost-effective dental additive manufacturing solutions.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Biodegradable polymer
KW - Digital dentistry
KW - Environment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010701750
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105972
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105972
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105010701750
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 161
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 105972
ER -