Accounting for word-of-mouth effects in preference-based market forecasts

Christian Pescher, Martin Spann*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Consumers differ in their involvement in new product purchase decisions. Opinion leaders usually show a higher involvement in their purchase decisions than other consumers. This leads to a higher stability in their answers when being asked about their preferences. An important question that previous research has not analyzed yet is whether and how to capture this finding in preference-based market forecasts. The authors study these aspects for a representative sample of 364 consumers in the mobile phone market of a large European country. They find that assigning higher weights to the preferences of opinion leaders in aggregate market forecasts results in estimates that are more consistent with observed market shares than forecasts in which all consumers are given equal weights. The authors further test different measures of opinion leadership and find that sociometric indicators outperform psychographic constructs to account for the outcome of opinion leadership in preference-based market forecasts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-107
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Forecasting
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • conjoint analysis
  • forecasting
  • social network analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for word-of-mouth effects in preference-based market forecasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this