Acceptability, feasibility, fidelity and quality implementation of the culturally adapted version of the Social Competence Promotion Program among Young Adolescents (“Mi Mejor Plan”) to prevent substance use among adolescents in Chile: a pilot randomized control study

Saray Ramirez, Natalia Ríos, Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona, Marcela Cárcamo, Alejandro Sepulveda-Pañaloza, Ricardo Araya, Jorge Gaete*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Substance use among adolescents is a public health problem. We culturally adapted The Social Competence Promotion Program for Young Adolescents (SCPP-YA) program to the school context in Chile (henceforth “Mi Mejor Plan or MMP”) and assessed the acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and quality of the implementation among 6th graders. We also explored the efficacy of the program in improving individual protective factors and reducing risk factors and substance use. Methods: Cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in Chile. The schools were randomly assigned to one of two conditions in a 1:1 ratio: 1) the "MMP" intervention group, and 2) the Control group. The program consisted of a 16-h class-based curriculum promoting social problem-solving skills delivered by a trained facilitator. Primary outcomes were acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and quality of the implementation using detailed reports of facilitators and from observers of the performance of the facilitators in vivo. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of the intervention on secondary outcomes: 30-day prevalence of tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis use and individual risk and protective factors promoted by MMP. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis using mixed models, taking into account the hierarchical nature of the data. Results: Seven hundred sixty-five 6th graders from 11 schools were enrolled (one school dropped out after the randomization); 608 were analyzed at baseline, and 538 were analyzed post-intervention. 52.5% were male, and the average age was 11.3 in both groups. All 16 sessions were implemented, and students’ attendance at each session ranged from 83.8% to 92.4%. The program was generally well-received, with up to 91.3% of students rating acceptability positively. Facilitators and observers reported high adherence to the contents of the program in most sessions. Protective factors, such as negative beliefs about tobacco and alcohol, increased significantly in the IG. Still, there were no significant changes in substance use, risk factors, emotion regulation, or school membership. Conclusions: The MMP program was well accepted, and we achieved high levels of implementation and fidelity. The program improved some individual protective factors, such as negative beliefs about tobacco and alcohol, with no changes in substance use among adolescents. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04236947; registration date: 17/01/2020.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1860
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • Acceptability
  • Adolescents
  • Feasibility
  • Fidelity
  • Prevention
  • Substance Abuse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acceptability, feasibility, fidelity and quality implementation of the culturally adapted version of the Social Competence Promotion Program among Young Adolescents (“Mi Mejor Plan”) to prevent substance use among adolescents in Chile: a pilot randomized control study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this