TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel, minimally invasive method to retrieve failed dental implants in elderly patients
AU - Leighton, Yerko
AU - Miranda, Javier
AU - De Souza, Raphael Freitas
AU - Weber, Benjamin
AU - Borie, Eduardo
N1 - © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/3/19
Y1 - 2021/3/19
N2 - This practice-based study presents the clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive method for retrieving failed dental implants from elderly patients. Traditional removal methods for failed dental implants include trephination and other invasive procedures. That can be a special concern for the elderly, since aging exacerbates oral surgery-related morbidity and anxiety. This retrospective cohort study gathers data from 150 patients seen in a private clinic. Their implants (n = 199) failed due to biological, mechanical, or iatrogenic causes, and were removed as part of their treatment plan. Collected data included: (1) implant location (maxilla/mandible, anterior/posterior region), (2) reasons for implant retrieval, (3) connection type, (4) removal torque, and (5) operatory procedure— flapless and using a counter-torque removal kit, whenever possible. Flapless/minimally invasive retrieval was successful for 193 implants (97%). The remaining six implants demanded trephination (open-flap). The most common reasons for implant retrieval (81%) involved biological aspects, whereas iatrogenic (12%) and biomechanical (7%) reasons were less common. The surgical technique used was not associated to connection types or removal torque. Authors conclude that a counter-torque ratchet system is a minimally invasive technique with a high success rate in retrieving implants from elderly patients. Present findings support its use as a first-line approach for implant retrieval in that population.
AB - This practice-based study presents the clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive method for retrieving failed dental implants from elderly patients. Traditional removal methods for failed dental implants include trephination and other invasive procedures. That can be a special concern for the elderly, since aging exacerbates oral surgery-related morbidity and anxiety. This retrospective cohort study gathers data from 150 patients seen in a private clinic. Their implants (n = 199) failed due to biological, mechanical, or iatrogenic causes, and were removed as part of their treatment plan. Collected data included: (1) implant location (maxilla/mandible, anterior/posterior region), (2) reasons for implant retrieval, (3) connection type, (4) removal torque, and (5) operatory procedure— flapless and using a counter-torque removal kit, whenever possible. Flapless/minimally invasive retrieval was successful for 193 implants (97%). The remaining six implants demanded trephination (open-flap). The most common reasons for implant retrieval (81%) involved biological aspects, whereas iatrogenic (12%) and biomechanical (7%) reasons were less common. The surgical technique used was not associated to connection types or removal torque. Authors conclude that a counter-torque ratchet system is a minimally invasive technique with a high success rate in retrieving implants from elderly patients. Present findings support its use as a first-line approach for implant retrieval in that population.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85103499535&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=9a379e87d1cd3015e6f01f8a078cdef5&sot=b&sdt=b&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28A+novel%2C+minimally+invasive+method+to+retrieve+failed+dental+implants+in+elderly+patients%29&sl=104&sessionSearchId=9a379e87d1cd3015e6f01f8a078cdef5&relpos=0
U2 - 10.3390/app11062766
DO - 10.3390/app11062766
M3 - Article
SN - 2076-3417
VL - 11
SP - 2
EP - 7
JO - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
JF - Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
IS - 6
M1 - 2766
ER -